Global Investing

Main menu:

Currency Converter


Site search

Categories

  • Subscribe


    Feed
    addtomyyahoo4
    Subscribe in NewsGator Online
    Add to My AOL
    Subscribe in Rojo
    Subscribe with Bloglines
    Add to netvibes
    Add to Google

    Add International Investing to Newsburst from CNET News.com
    Add to SiteShuffle
    Subscribe in FeedLounge
    Subscribe in Bloglines
    Bitty Browser
    Subscribe in NewsAlloy
  • Archive



    “Should Analysts Who Don’t Own Stocks Be Trusted?”

    Remove the part about “Who Don’t Own Stock” and you’ve got a legit story. Another silly rule designed to prevent conflicts makes analyst guesses less trustworthy.

    You’ve almost certainly seen it: Every time an analyst on CNBC comes on to talk about a stock there is The Screen. We find out whether they own the stock, their family owns the stock, their firm owns the stock, their pet owns the stock, etc.

    More often than not, the answer is “none of the above”: They don’t own the stock they’re talking about, and neither does anyone they know.

    I say these people with no conflicts shouldn’t be trusted. How am I to take seriously someone in the financial services business who tell people to own a stock, but doesn’t own it themselves? They have no skin in the game, and in a business entirely built around wealth creation, self-interest and greed, that makes me suspicious.


    Share this article: del.icio.us | Digg it | Netscape | reddit | Yahoo MyWeb |

    Write a comment